10/21/2021 0 Comments Nvidia For Mac Pro 2012
A 2.8GHz i7-4980HQ is available as an upgrade option. Our review unit includes a 2.5GHz Core i7-4870HQ. The entry-level Pro includes a 2.2GHz quad-core i7-4770HQ. We hoped that Iris Pro 6200 could help close that gap, but, as it stands, an entry-level Retina MacBook Pro from 2015 still has poorer graphics performance than an entry-level Retina MacBook Pro from three years ago.There aren't many other internal changes to keep track of, but here’s a quick rundown: Integrated graphics chips are usually bottlenecked by the relatively slow general-use RAM they need to share with the rest of the system, but that extra cache helps to solve the problem (and serves as a big L4 cache for the CPU, besides).Though the Iris Pro 5200 GPU is still head-and-shoulders above the HD 6000 and Iris 6100 GPUs in the smaller 2015 MacBooks, it’s usually slower than the dedicated Nvidia GeForce GT 650M GPU included in the original 2012 Retina MacBook Pro.
![]() ![]() ![]() The competitionIf OS X is a requirement, there really isn't another MacBook that comes close to this level of performance. Just know that the entry-level, Iris-only model may behave slightly differently from the ones we’ve reviewed here. The more powerful AMD GPU is also a bit more power-hungry, it would seem.We did try to run the WebGL test on the integrated GPU using GFXCardStatus to see what the difference was, but the results were anomalously low so we haven’t reported them here. In the heavier WebGL test (which only uses the dedicated GPU), both models last for about three hours, but the 2014 GeForce-equipped MacBook lasts a bit longer. Those theoretical increases don’t necessarily mirror the numbers you’ll see in the real world, but the Pro is decidedly faster than even the already-quick 13-inch Broadwell laptops.In our light Wi-Fi browsing test (which only uses the integrated GPU) with the screen set to a brightness of 200 nits, it actually lasts for around 10 hours, besting the old model by half an hour. And four PCI Express 3.0 lanes provide around 4GB per second (PCIe 3.0 has less overhead than older versions). Nvidia Pro 2012 1080P Display ToConclusionsOn the one hand, it's hard not to be underwhelmed by this MacBook Pro update. Fast storage may or may not matter to you, but there's no contest there. That's probably the one we'd look at first.Also worth noting: all of these PC workstations ship with large-but-slow spinning HDDs, and when they can be upgraded to SSDs, they're limited to SATA III models. In terms of styling, size, and weight, the most credible competition is probably Dell's M3800 workstation, the Linux version of which we looked at a couple of months ago. Lenovo's ThinkPad W451 is likewise pretty big, but its low starting price is intriguing (you'll need to spend a little more to upgrade from the 1080p display to the 2880×1620 display and get more than 4GB of RAM, though). Both Toshiba and HP offer 4K workstations with quad-core Haswell CPUs and dedicated graphics for around or just over $2,000, though the Tecra W50 and ZBook 15 G2 (God, these names) are a fair bit larger and heavier than the MacBook. There are good and bad things about this chase. A laptop like the new Retina MacBook just wouldn't have been possible in 2012, but high-end performance hasn't improved so drastically. Especially in the last two or three years, Intel and others have been chasing performance-per-watt and low-power chips like Core M rather than pushing performance at the high end. And it's odd that Apple is skipping Intel's recently released quad-core Broadwell chips, which we assumed was what was holding up the refresh until a couple of weeks ago.On the other hand, the 15-inch MacBook Pro is the victim of industry trends. The dedicated AMD GPU makes some compelling-ish additions (5K display support with two DisplayPort cables, slightly better graphics performance, significantly improved OpenCL performance), but adding it to your laptop costs $500 and it's still based on a three-year-old chip (you do get another 256GB of storage and a faster CPU for that $500, but you unfortunately can't separate the GPU from those other upgrades). Thinner and lighter than older non-Retina models. Characteristically great build quality and keyboard and good display, although some PC makers have put 4K panels in laptops this size. Astoundingly fast SSD, better than the 13-inch MacBook models and anything shipping in any PCs right now. Still the fastest Mac laptop by a long sight. But if you already have a 15-inch Retina MacBook Pro, there's still no real reason to consider upgrading at this point. It's got performance head-and-shoulders above all other MacBooks. Android emulator app macNo Nvidia GPU means no CUDA support, if that's important to you. As (relatively) big and heavy as you'd expect a 15-inch laptop to be. Expensive, especially with the dedicated graphics option. Good battery life and slightly improved from the 2013/2014 models in light use. The Force Touch trackpad isn't quite the same as a clicky trackpad, but it's close and adds new software features.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorErik ArchivesCategories |